Skip to main content
· 5/11/1989

People v. Blanchette

Citations

  • 538 N.E.2d 237
  • 182 Ill. App. 3d 396
  • 131 Ill. Dec. 49
  • 1989 Ill. App. LEXIS 662

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “While we recognize this [mailbox] rule, we find no proof of mailing was filed in the instant case. *** The appellant has the burden of including those matters in the record necessary for the issues to be reviewed. *** Defendant’s notice of appeal was not timely”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Inglis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.