People v. Black

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that it was proper for the trial court for sentencing purposes to consider whether defendant’s character showed he was unlikely to commit future crimes and whether circumstances were unlikely to recur
• noting that it was proper for the trial court for sentencing purposes to consider whether defendant’s character showed he was unlikely to commit future crimes and whether circumstances were unlikely to recur

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Markiewicz
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-06-22· cited 50×
• People v. Wilburn
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-05-20· cited 23×
• People v. Dugan
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-12-04· cited 16×
• People v. Torres
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-01-19· cited 15×
• People v. Williams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-07-18· cited 14×
• People v. Todd
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-02-11· cited 6×
• People v. Calhoun
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2010-09-10
• People v. Behl
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-05-31

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. La Pointe
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1982-01-29· cited 680×
• People v. Saldivar
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1986-09-17· cited 381×
• People v. Alejos
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1983-10-04· cited 160×
• People v. James
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1987-10-05· cited 142×
• People v. Wilson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1991-04-18· cited 79×
• People v. Anderson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1986-03-19· cited 55×
• People v. Smith
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-06-07· cited 40×
• People v. Hall
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-08-12· cited 22×
• People v. Nally
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-07-22· cited 16×
• People v. Smith
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-03-07· cited 11×