Skip to main content
· 9/27/1995

People v. Bills

Citations

  • 38 Cal. App. 4th 953
  • 45 Cal. Rptr. 2d 364
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7663
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 13050
  • 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 943

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The cases which have reversed convictions because records were lost involved very substantial omissions, such as all or a large portion or a crucial portion of the reporter’s notes, or a crucial item of evidence.” (internal citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vogel (c.S.)

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.