· 9/27/1995
People v. Bills
Citations
- 38 Cal. App. 4th 953
- 45 Cal. Rptr. 2d 364
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7663
- 95 Daily Journal DAR 13050
- 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 943
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The cases which have reversed convictions because records were lost involved very substantial omissions, such as all or a large portion or a crucial portion of the reporter’s notes, or a crucial item of evidence.” (internal citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vogel (c.S.)
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.