Appellate Court of Illinois· 2/26/1985

People v. Bias

Citations

475 N.E.2d 253
131 Ill. App. 3d 98
86 Ill. Dec. 256
1985 Ill. App. LEXIS 1632

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

rejecting instruction in robbery case where eyewitness failed to describe key distinguishing facial features and gave inconsistent descriptions because empirical studies are not unanimous
rejecting instruction in robbery ease where eyewitness failed to describe key distinguishing facial features and gave inconsistent descriptions because empirical studies are not unanimous
rejecting instruction in robbery case where eyewitness failed to describe key distinguishing facial features and gave inconsistent descriptions because empirical studies are not unanimous
rejecting instruction in robbery case where eyewitness failed to describe key distinguishing facial features and gave inconsistent descriptions because empirical studies are not unanimous
rejecting instruction in robbery case where eyewitness failed to describe key distinguishing facial features and gave inconsistent descriptions because empirical studies are not unanimous
inaccuracies regarding the “presence or absence of a beard, mustache, or tattoo *** do not render an identification utterly inadmissible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mills

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Bias

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.