People v. Bethea

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating revocation is necessary to protect the public when there is “a pattern of misconduct [that] leads us to conclude that future misconduct is likely”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. D'Angelo
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2006-02-24· cited 41×
• People v. Melvin
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1976-07-19· cited 16×
• People v. Mosley
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1977-03-03· cited 7×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Meier
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1973-05-22· cited 52×
• People v. Berthiaume
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1975-03-11· cited 43×
• People v. McGuire
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1972-03-22· cited 33×
• People v. Stinson
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1975-02-10· cited 19×
• People v. Alsteens
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1973-09-24· cited 19×
• People v. Wright
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1975-02-24· cited 18×
• People v. Miller
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1971-08-30· cited 18×
• People v. Keshishian
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1973-02-21· cited 14×
• People v. Stevens
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1972-02-25· cited 12×
• People v. Schrantz
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1973-10-31· cited 4×