People v. Bernal
Citations
- 10 Cal. 66
- 1858 Cal. LEXIS 189
Syllabus
<p>There is no precise age within which, children are excluded from giving testimony. Their competency is to be determined, not by their age, but by the degree of their understanding and knowledge.</p> <p>It is essential that they should possess sufficient intelligence to receive just impressions of the facts respecting which they are examined, sufficient capacity to relate them correctly, and sufficient instruction to appreciate the nature and obligation of an oath.</p> <p>It is for the Court to decide the question of their competency, when they are offered as witnesses.</p> <p>If over fourteen years of age, the presumption is that they possess the requisite knowledge and understanding 3 but, if under that age, the presumption is otherwise, and it must be removed upon their examination by the Court, or under its direction and in its presence, before they can be sworn.</p>
Judges: Field
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa· 1902-10-08· cited 51×
- Oliver v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1920-07-06· cited 18×
- People v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1941-09-19· cited 17×
- People v. SchollCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1964-03-13· cited 14×
- State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court· 1881-10-15· cited 14×
- Bradburn v. PeacockCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1955-08-22· cited 6×
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1960-01-15· cited 5×
- Republic of Hawaii v. Ah WongHawaii Supreme Court· 1896-11-25· cited 5×
- People v. RiveraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1907-06-12
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.