People v. Berk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a defendant who witnessed his estranged wife engaged in sexual activity with another man did not have a sufficient ground for an EED defense
• a defendant who witnessed his estranged wife engaged in sexual activity with another man did not have a sufficient ground for an EED defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Shiwlochan v. Portuondo
  E.D. New York· 2004-11-10· cited 10×
• Bien v. Smith
  E.D. New York· 2008-04-19· cited 6×
• Linnen v. Poole
  W.D. New York· 2011-02-04· cited 3×
• Linnen v. Poole
  W.D. New York· 2010-02-24· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Bleakley
  New York Court of Appeals· 1987-05-07· cited 13,541×
• People v. Watts
  New York Court of Appeals· 1982-11-16· cited 365×
• People v. Magliato
  New York Court of Appeals· 1986-07-08· cited 72×
• People v. Doctor
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-12-19· cited 21×
• People v. Tumerman
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1987-10-13· cited 15×
• People v. Oakes
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-12-21· cited 13×
• People v. Emmick
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1988-01-29· cited 12×
• People v. David
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1988-10-31· cited 7×
• People v. Mai
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1991-08-01· cited 7×
• People v. Manzella
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-12-29· cited 3×
• People v. Owens
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-04-15· cited 3×