People v. Bennett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a switchboard was not an eavesdropping device because it could transmit messages
• a switchboard was not an eavesdropping device because it could transmit messages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mitee Racers, Inc. v. Carnival-Amusement Safety Board
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-02-23· cited 15×
• People v. Jenkins
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2012-01-19· cited 11×
• People v. Armbrust
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-08-23· cited 7×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Gaines
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1981-12-04· cited 258×
• People v. Lutz
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1978-10-06· cited 134×
• The PEOPLE v. Dixon
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1961-09-22· cited 49×
• People v. Gervasi
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1982-04-16· cited 35×
• People v. Perez
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1968-02-27· cited 12×
• Bismarck Hotel Co. v. Petriko
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1961-03-29· cited 10×
• People v. Brown
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1970-11-05· cited 10×
• People v. Giannopoulos
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1974-06-03· cited 9×
• People v. Petrus
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-07-20· cited 7×
• People v. Search Warrant
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1968-05-21· cited 5×