People v. Bennett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 651(c) does not apply where counsel filed the initial petition, but leaving for another day the question of a freestanding right to a reasonable-level-of-assistance, where defendant did not raise that issue on appeal
• “Rule 651(c) is inapplicable when the original petition was not filed pro se”
• “Rule 651(c) is inapplicable when the original petition was not filed pro se”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Anguiano
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2014-03-05· cited 20×
• People v. Blake
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2022-10-18· cited 11×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• People v. Artis
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2009-01-23· cited 310×
• People v. Richmond
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1999-11-18· cited 52×
• People v. Bennett
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-12-05· cited 27×