Skip to main content

People v. Bennett

Citations

  • 494 N.E.2d 847
  • 144 Ill. App. 3d 184
  • 98 Ill. Dec. 725
  • 1986 Ill. App. LEXIS 2330

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • excusing incorrect case number on pro se notice of appeal because the proper case was identified in the body of the notice
  • excusing incorrect case number on pro se notice of appeal because the proper case was identified in the body of the notice
  • excusing incorrect case number on pro se notice of appeal because the proper case was identified in the body of the notice
  • jurisdiction found where pro se notice of appeal contained the wrong - 16 - case number but the body of the notice referred to the correct case
  • jurisdiction found where pro se notice of appeal contained the wrong case number but the body of the notice referred to the correct case
  • incorrect numerical designation on pro se notice of appeal was treated as clerical error where body of notice clearly referred to matter sought to be reviewed and all of defendants’ arguments pertained only to that case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morthland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.