People v. Bellanca

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• despite the need for secrecy, the defendant has a right to a grand jury transcript in order to be prepared for cross-examination of the witnesses
• despite the need for secrecy, the defendant has a right to a grand jury transcript in order to be prepared for cross-examination of the witnesses
• “[T]he ‘grand juror’ ordered the issuance of a warrant for the arrest of the defendant so that he might be prosecuted for perjury and such warrant issued on that day.”
• “[T]he ‘grand juror’ ordered the issuance of a warrant for the arrest of the defendant so that he might be prosecuted for perjury and such warrant issued on that day.”
• “[T]he ‘grand juror’ ordered the issuance of a warrant for the arrest of the defendant so that he might be prosecuted for perjury and such warrant issued on that day.”
• “[T]he ‘grand juror’ ordered the issuance of a warrant for the arrest of the defendant so that he might be prosecuted for perjury and such warrant issued on that day.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named People v. Bellanca

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• People v. Bellanca
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1972-10-26· cited 8×
• People v. Bellanca
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1970-06-26· cited 5×