People v. Bell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because alibi witnesses were uncooperative, the prosecutor was unable to discover the existence of rebuttal witnesses, hence the finding of due diligence was affirmed
• because alibi witnesses were uncooperative, the prosecutor was unable to discover the existence of rebuttal witnesses, hence the finding of due diligence was affirmed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• People v. Travis
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1993-09-08· cited 42×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wardius v. Oregon
  Supreme Court· 1973-06-11· cited 827×
• People v. McGillen
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1974-08-02· cited 145×
• People v. Stinson
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-03-02· cited 30×
• People v. Diaz
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1980-07-22· cited 27×
• People v. Terry Alexander
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1978-04-17· cited 26×
• People v. Rosen
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1984-08-20· cited 23×
• People v. Smith
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1986-07-07· cited 16×
• People v. LeFlore
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1983-01-10· cited 12×
• People v. Etchison
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1983-02-24· cited 11×
• People v. Hubbard
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1987-04-20· cited 11×
• People v. Williams
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1981-07-23· cited 10×
• People v. Wilson
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1979-05-22· cited 9×
• People v. Fisher
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1978-12-05· cited 7×
• People v. Coulter
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1980-01-03· cited 5×