People v. Beecher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that even if the lawyer’s relationship with the client was not sexual, their close personal relationship caused him to lose the objectivity and independent judgment necessary to represent the client
• stating that the lawyer’s subjective belief there was no conflict was unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chief Disciplinary Counsel v. Zelotes
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-08-19
• Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee v. Candes Vonniest Prewitt
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2022-06-06
• In the Matter of Igor Raykin Attorney-Respondent:
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2025-03-24

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re the Marriage of Hunt
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1995-12-18· cited 325×
• Martinelli v. DIST. COURT IN & FOR CITY, ETC.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1980-02-04· cited 92×
• In Re Marriage of Franks
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1975-11-17· cited 72×
• Estate of Burford v. Burford
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1997-03-31· cited 48×
• In Re Vincenti
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-04-27· cited 28×
• People v. Good
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1995-04-03· cited 27×
• In Re the Application for Disciplinary Action Against Dvorak
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-07-13· cited 24×
• People v. Alexis
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1991-02-19· cited 19×
• In Re Attorney D.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2002-11-18· cited 18×
• People v. Boyer
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1997-03-31· cited 15×
• Matter of Golden
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-01-19· cited 13×