People v. Beaty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• there can be no review of an interlocutory order in the absence of a statute or a rule specifically authorizing it
• “Rule 604(a)(3) confers unconditional release and restores people to the same freedom enjoyed before any charges were initiated.”
• there can be no review of an interlocutory order in the absence of a statute or a rule specifically authorizing it
• dicta agreeing that bail orders were only reviewable under the limited and clearly defined procedures set forth in Rule 604(c)
• “The likelihood of a conviction on the evidence that the State currently possesses provides a sound foundation for the State’s position that enhances the compelling nature of the reasons set forth to justify continued detention.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Baltimore
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-03-17· cited 12×
• People v. Albitar
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2007-06-29· cited 7×
• People v. King - Supplemental filed 1/7/10
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-11-09· cited 6×
• People v. King
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2010-01-07· cited 1×