People v. Beasley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Clearly, [the statute] elevate[s] the offense (not just the sentence
• “ ‘trial court does not have a duty to consider all possible theories; rather, its task is to rule on the basis of the theories presented’ ” (quoting People v. Hamilton, 283 Ill. App. 3d 854, 861 (1996) rev’d on other grounds, 179 Ill. 2d 319 (1997))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Ross
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-10-28· cited 38×
• People v. Ramos
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-12-14· cited 37×
• People v. Dobbs
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-11-22· cited 15×
• People v. Peterson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-07-26· cited 5×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Enoch
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1988-02-11· cited 3,273×
• People v. Prim
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1972-10-02· cited 576×
• People v. Thomas
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1996-03-21· cited 184×
• People v. Jameson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1994-10-20· cited 155×
• People v. Felella
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1989-09-20· cited 128×
• People v. Mahaffey
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1995-03-23· cited 89×
• People v. Friesland
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1985-11-21· cited 87×
• People v. Olivo
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1998-09-24· cited 24×
• People v. Smith
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-02-16· cited 23×
• People v. Hamilton
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-09-25· cited 15×
• Salcik v. Tassone
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-10-21· cited 11×
• People v. Lavas
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-02-07· cited 6×