People v. Beardsley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Punctuation -2- is an important factor in determining legislative intent, and the Legislature is presumed to know the rules of grammar.”
• “Punctuation is an important factor in determining legislative intent, and the Legislature is presumed to know the rules of grammar.”
• “Punctuation -2- is an important factor in determining legislative intent, and the Legislature is presumed to know the rules of grammar.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Henderson
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2009-02-03· cited 59×
• People v. Bylsma; People v. Overholt
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2016-05-17· cited 22×
• People v. English; People v. Smith
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2016-10-27· cited 7×
• Doe v. Doe
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2010-07-13· cited 1×
• People of Michigan v. Lymance English
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2016-10-27
• People of Michigan v. Shaun Paul Lydic
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2021-01-28

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sun Valley Foods Co. v. Ward
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1999-06-29· cited 475×
• Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. Marlette Homes, Inc.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1998-02-24· cited 215×
• People v. Webb
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1998-07-21· cited 125×
• MacOmb County Prosecutor v. Murphy
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2001-05-30· cited 119×
• People v. Adair
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1996-07-16· cited 119×
• People v. Warren
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2000-07-11· cited 65×
• People v. Pitts
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1996-06-11· cited 25×
• Mayor of Lansing v. Public Service Commission
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2003-07-23· cited 10×