Skip to main content

People v. Bates

Citations

  • 283 N.W.2d 785
  • 91 Mich. App. 506
  • 1979 Mich. App. LEXIS 2277

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating, in the context of other-acts evidence, that a defendant may put a matter into “issue by opening argument, cross-examination, or the presentation of affirmative evidence”
  • the defendant has the burden to prove the exemption now located in MCL 333.7531 [2] because the lack of authorization to deliver a controlled substance is not an element of a delivery charge
  • the defendant has the burden to prove the exemption now located in MCL 333.7531[2] because the lack of authorization to deliver a controlled substance is not an element of a delivery charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaufman, Riley, Theiler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.