People v. Bashaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on counsel’s subsequent remarks to find her Rule 651(c) certificate inadequate
• dismissal of postconviction petition reversed where certificate deficient and cause remanded for compliance with Rule 651(c)
• to comply with Rule 651(c), postconviction counsel would have to be “thoroughly conversant with the trial proceedings pertaining to trial counsel’s alleged [trial] errors.”
• when determining whether the Rule 651(c) certificate was sufficient in that case, the Second District took no issue with counsel’s statement 12 that “I have consulted by mail with [defendant] concerning the allegations in this post-conviction petition”
• reversing the dismissal of defendant’s postconviction petition
• finding no substantial compliance with Rule 651(c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).