People v. Barto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that what is now section 5-4-1(a) “was not intended to require a sentencing hearing when the trial judge had already indicated his concurrence in the disposition proposed by the parties”
• holding that what is now section 5-4-1(a) \was not intended to require a sentencing hearing when the trial judge had already indicated his concurrence in the disposition proposed by the parties\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).