People v. Barrus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Insufficient evidence of indecent exposure where nothing showed “that [the] defendant knew the witness saw him or that he attempted to show, exhibit, or display his genitals to her.”
• Insufficient evidence of indecent exposure where nothing showed “that [the] defendant knew the witness saw him or that he attempted to show, exhibit, or display his genitals to her.”
• Insufficient evidence of indecent exposure where nothing showed “that [the] defendant knew the witness saw him or that he attempted to show, exhibit, or display his genitals to her.”
• “[S]elf-defense is an available defense against the charge of obstructing a peace officer when a defendant reasonably believes that unreasonable or excessive force is being used by the peace officer.”
• “Although the People were not required to prove that the witness was subjectively affronted or alarmed, the statute does require proof that the defendant’s conduct would tend to cause offense or fear to a reasonable person.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Although the People were not required to prove that the witness was subjectively affronted or alarmed, the statute does require proof that the defendant’s conduct would tend to cause offense or fear to a reasonable person.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).