Supreme Court of Colorado· 3/12/1984
People v. Barron
Citations
- 677 P.2d 1370
- 1984 Colo. LEXIS 505
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- examining a court’s common law power to punish a defendant for criminal contempt
- civil contempt proceedings are remedial and not intended as a deterrent to offenses against the public, whereas criminal contempt is prosecuted to preserve the power and vindicate the dignity of the court by punishing the contemnor
- civil contempt proceedings are remedial and not intended as a deterrent to offenses against the public, whereas criminal contempt is prosecuted to preserve the power and vindicate the dignity of the court by punishing the contemnor
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Erickson, Neighbors
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. AleemSupreme Court of Colorado· 2007-01-08· cited 343×
- People v. KrihoColorado Court of Appeals· 1999-04-29· cited 207×
- People v. ShellSupreme Court of Colorado· 2006-12-18· cited 70×
- People v. RazatosSupreme Court of Colorado· 1985-05-20· cited 43×
- Kourlis v. PortColorado Court of Appeals· 2000-06-08· cited 10×
- In Re the Marriage of LamuttColorado Court of Appeals· 1994-08-04· cited 7×
- v. RoehrsColorado Court of Appeals· 2019-03-07· cited 7×
- Benninghoven v. DeesColorado Court of Appeals· 1993-02-11· cited 6×
- Eichhorn v. KelleyColorado Court of Appeals· 2005-05-16· cited 6×
- In Re the Marriage of WeisSupreme Court of Colorado· 2010-06-07· cited 5×
- In Re StoneColorado Court of Appeals· 1985-06-06· cited 2×
- Schnier v. District Court In & For the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado· 1985-02-04· cited 1×
- People v. TyerColorado Court of Appeals· 1990-02-08· cited 1×
- Schnier v. DIST. CT., CITY & COUNTY OF DENVERSupreme Court of Colorado· 1985-02-04
- Vecellio v. Regents of the University of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals· 2010-09-02
- United States v. SeefriedDistrict of Columbia· 2022-10-29
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 3,248×
- In Re OliverSupreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 2,065×
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 1,167×
- Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 789×
- Codispoti v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 370×
- Nye v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1941-04-14· cited 357×
- Penfield Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court· 1947-05-05· cited 327×
- Frank v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-10-13· cited 306×
- Latrobe Steel Co. v. United Steelworkers of AmericaThird Circuit· 1976-11-15· cited 185×
- Department of Health v. RoselleSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1961-03-20· cited 71×
- McCann v. New York Stock ExchangeSecond Circuit· 1935-12-09· cited 67×
- Schwartz v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1914-09-08· cited 38×
- Losavio v. DISTRICT COURT IN & FOR TENTH JUD. DIST.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1973-07-02· cited 36×
- Austin v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado· 1964-12-21· cited 27×
- District Attorney v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado· 1962-05-07· cited 19×
- Federal Trade Commission v. A. McLean & SonSeventh Circuit· 1938-02-08· cited 18×
- Pr v. District Court for County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado· 1981-11-23· cited 16×
- Lobb v. HodgesColorado Court of Appeals· 1982-02-04· cited 13×
- Robran v. People Ex Rel. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado· 1971-01-18· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.