People v. Barrett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming criminal contempt judgment; holding that because obscenities and profanities were not directed at trial judge, judge was not required to recuse
• affirming criminal contempt judgment; holding that because obscenities and profanities were not directed at trial judge, judge was not required to recuse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Payne v. Coates-Miller, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-01-18· cited 23×
• In re L.G.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-03-31· cited 6×
• People v. Dorris
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-02-17· cited 1×
• In Re LG
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-03-31
• Medow v. Flavin
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-11-27

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Taylor v. Hayes
  Supreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 663×
• People v. Jashunsky
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1972-03-30· cited 56×