People v. Barnes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court did not have duty to sua sponte continue trial to permit defendant to subpoena expert witness to support his case
• trial court did not have duty to sua sponte continue trial to permit defendant to subpoena expert witness to support his case
• where the defendant did not renew his motion to compel the appearance of a witness or seek a continuance to prepare the foundation for the anticipated testimony, the court did not abuse its discretion in declining to declare continuance sua sponte to enforce subpoena

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Franklin
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1986-07-21· cited 56×
• People v. Minter
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2015-09-09· cited 45×
• People v. DeRossett
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-11-25· cited 20×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Lewis
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1981-11-13· cited 340×
• People v. Lindsey
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1974-01-16· cited 37×
• People v. Derra
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-01-23· cited 30×
• People v. Nieves
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1982-10-22· cited 27×
• People v. Hamilton
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1974-02-27· cited 10×