People v. Barfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the discretion accorded to a trial judge \is not only broad but must be applied flexibly to the unique situation of each individual case\
• the discretion accorded to a trial judge “is not only broad but must be applied flexibly to the unique situation of each individual case”
• the discretion accorded to a trial judge \is not only broad but must be applied flexibly to the unique situation of each individual case\
• \The law recognizes that judges are not clairvoyant and that his or her determination that the jury could not render an impartial verdict may or may not be correct.\
• \The law recognizes that judges are not clairvoyant and that his or her determination that the jury could not render an impartial verdict may or may not be correct.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Bagley
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-05-05· cited 18×
• People v. Burtron
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2007-09-28· cited 13×
• Quinones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-09-06· cited 7×
• People v. Miller
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-02-15· cited 7×
• People v. Owens
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2007-05-17· cited 6×
• Quiñones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-09-06· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Arizona v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 2,314×
• Illinois v. Somerville
  Supreme Court· 1973-02-27· cited 1,368×
• The PEOPLE v. Chaffin
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1971-09-30· cited 23×
• People v. Vilt
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-12-20· cited 9×
• People v. Schuppert
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-08-23· cited 8×
• People v. Lucas
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-03-20· cited 6×
• People v. Cooper
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-03-01· cited 5×