Michigan Court of Appeals· 4/18/2003

People v. Barber

Citations

659 N.W.2d 674
255 Mich. App. 288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the defendant failed to preserve his argument on appeal that his convictions for burning real property and burning a dwelling home violated double jeopardy because the defendant raised the issue for the first time on appeal
concluding that the defendant failed to preserve his argument on appeal that his convictions for burning real property and burning a dwelling home violated double jeopardy because the defendant raised the issue for the first time on appeal
analyzing the defendant’s three arson convictions in a double jeopardy context and noting that “[t]he ‘unit of prosecution’ has been applied in other contexts to determine whether multiple punishments violate double jeopardy principles”
defendant properly convicted of forty-one counts of arson based on a single fire that destroyed forty-one apartment units

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Cavanagh, Neff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.