People v. Baltimore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[o]ther circumstances contribute to our determination that the defendant understood his rights carried over from the previous interview” including “[t]he place of interrogation [being] the same for both interviews”
• finding that the passage of three days from the defendant’s Miranda warnings and waiver to the time of his non-Mirandized inculpatory statements was not so stale or remote as to require fresh Miranda warnings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).