People v. Baltazar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a defendant has no right to use Crim. P. 17 subpoenas as an investigative tool because there is \no general constitutional right to discovery in a criminal case\
• “[T]he Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel includes an entitlement to no more than a thorough investigation, limited by reasonable professional judgments.”
• “[T]he Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel includes an entitlement to no more than a thorough investigation, limited by reasonable professional judgments.”
• “Both [the Colorado Supreme Court] and the United States Supreme Court have emphasized that their respective rules permit subpoenas only for the production of ‘evidence’ — not as an investigative tool.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).