People v. Ball

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that any substance that is capable of causing harm at some dosage meets the definition of a harmful chemical substance
• explaining that “[w]e construe an act as a whole to harmonize its provisions and carry out the purpose of the Legislature”
• “The Court must avoid construing a statute in a manner that renders statutory language nugatory or surplusage.”
• “The Court must avoid construing a statute in a manner that renders statutory language nugatory or surplusage.”
• quotation marks and citation omitted; emphasis added; alteration in original
• quotation marks and citation omitted; emphasis added; alteration in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Gary
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2014-04-17· cited 5×
• People of Michigan v. Jim Clarence Lutz Jr
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2013-09-18
• People of Michigan v. Kelly Annette Jackson
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2014-09-17
• People of Michigan v. Broderick David Savage
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2019-04-23
• People of Michigan v. Madison Danielle Perry
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2021-08-12

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Corning Glass Works v. Brennan
  Supreme Court· 1974-06-03· cited 1,323×
• City of Grand Rapids v. Crocker
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1922-07-20· cited 219×
• G C Timmis & Co. v. Guardian Alarm Co.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2003-06-18· cited 122×
• MacOmb County Prosecutor v. Murphy
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2001-05-30· cited 119×
• People v. Pasha
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2002-06-18· cited 50×
• People v. Hill
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2006-03-31· cited 26×
• People v. Blunt
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2009-01-13· cited 16×
• West Bloomfield Charter Township v. Karchon
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1995-02-21· cited 13×