Skip to main content

People v. Backus

Citations

  • 952 P.2d 846
  • 1998 WL 10735

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the parties’ concessions regarding the applicable law do not bind the appellate court
  • “[A]n appellate court is not bound by the concessions of the parties regarding the applicable law.”
  • “[W]e may choose to accept, but we are not bound by, the concessions of counsel regarding [the appellate record’s] contents or the inferences that properly may be drawn from it.”
  • We “rely on [our] own interpretation of the law, even if it is clearly inconsistent with the representations or arguments of counsel in briefs or in oral argument, and even if counsel has taken an internally inconsistent position.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rothenberg, Criswell, Davidson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.