People v. Back

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• not mandatory to call as a witness first person to whom 10-year-old victim reported sexual assaults
• “Unlike defendant’s arguments in his brief, which contain references to trial testimony, we focus only on the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the admissibility of these statements.” (Emphasis in original.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).