Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Appellate Court of Illinois· 11/16/2006

People v. Babolcsay

Citations

  • 859 N.E.2d 95
  • 307 Ill. Dec. 95
  • 368 Ill. App. 3d 712
  • 2006 Ill. App. LEXIS 1037

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • motion to suppress granted April 27; motion to reconsider denied June 14; notice of appeal filed within 30 days thereafter
  • motion to suppress granted April 27; motion to reconsider denied June 14; notice of appeal filed within 30 days thereafter
  • “The 10 1-21-1491 fruit-of-the-poisonous-tree doctrine is meant to prevent the admission of evidence obtained as a result of illegal conduct, not evidence obtained from an independent source.”
  • officer’s testimony admissible because “videotaping activity did not lead to the officer’s conversation”
  • officer’s testimony admissible because “videotaping activity did not lead to the officer’s conversation”
  • officer’s testimony admissible because “videotaping activity did not lead to the officer’s conversation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Babolcsay

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.