People v. Avignone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the burden of proof concerning “damage to the victim and the earning capacity of the defendant” rests with the prosecution
• recognizing that the burden of proof concerning “damage to the victim and the earning capacity of the defendant” rests with the prosecution
• discussing an older version of MCL 780.767(4), which also required evidence of a defendant’s ability to pay
• vacating a restitution order where the trial court had failed to consider the statutorily enumerated factors and urging the trial court to articulate the evidence in support of its order of restitution on remand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).