People v. Avery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ ‘[T]estimony based on hearsay that is not objected to at trial should be given appropriate consideration.’ ” (quoting People v. Becerril, 307 Ill. App. 3d 518, 526 (1999))
• the imposition of consecutive sentences does not constitute an increase in penalty
• the imposition of consecutive sentences does not constitute an increase in penalty
• the imposition of consecutive sentences does not constitute an increase in penalty
• the imposition of consecutive sentences does not constitute an increase in penalty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Phillips
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2005-12-01· cited 80×
• People v. Phillips
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-11-19· cited 15×
• People v. Hawkins
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-04-26· cited 8×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• People v. Bull
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1998-11-10· cited 417×
• People v. McClanahan
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2000-04-20· cited 118×
• People v. Primm
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-12-29· cited 54×
• People v. Wendt
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1994-12-22· cited 49×
• Thomas v. Greer
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 45×
• People v. Corrie
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-01-22· cited 31×
• People v. Becerril
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-09-02· cited 25×
• People v. Ransom
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-04-05· cited 16×