People v. Averhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the supreme court has set forth three different grounds to find that an error was harmless
• explaining that the supreme court has set forth three different grounds to find that an error was harmless
• “If the entire record shows that the jury has been made aware of adequate factors concerning relevant areas of impeachment of a witness, no constitutional question arises merely because defendant has been, prohibited on cross-examination from pursuing other areas of inquiry”
• where the record demonstrates that the jury has been notified of “relevant areas of impeachment of a witness, no constitutional question arises merely because the defendant has been prohibited on cross- examination from pursuing other areas of inquiry”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).