People v. Audison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because the record was elsewhere “sufficient to disclose the presence of reversible error,” the defendant was not deprived of his constitutional right to an appeal due to the fact that portions of the trial transcript were missing
• noting that the defendant’s right to an appeal is satisfied where the surviving record is sufficient to allow evaluation of the defendant’s claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).