Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Appellate Court of Illinois· 3/30/2007

People v. Atou

Citations

  • 865 N.E.2d 437
  • 372 Ill. App. 3d 78
  • 310 Ill. Dec. 113
  • 2007 Ill. App. LEXIS 319

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • local court rules “may not abrogate, limit or modify existing law,” including statutory speedy-trial provision (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • local rule requiring that speedy trial demands be served on the State’s Attorney in open court and striking demands that were not so served improperly placed an additional burden on defendants seeking to file such demands, where the speedy trial statute did not require such service
  • local rule requiring that speedy trial demands be served on the State's Attorney in open court and striking demands that were not so served improperly placed an additional burden on defendants seeking to file such demands, where the speedy trial statute did not require such service

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Atou

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.