People v. Astorga-Lider

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• offering that the intent is to be sought for in the instrument itself and “if the words convey a definite meaning, involving no absurdity or conflict with other portions of the instrument, that meaning which is apparent on its face must be adopted”
• dictum that where a court erroneously holds that immunity applies and orders a witness to testify, “[n]o court would permit the testimony of a witness, truthfully given under such circumstances, to be afterwards used against him in any judicial proceeding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).