People v. Asevedo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that when the prosecution presents two alternate theories of a single element, the evidence need only be sufficient for one theory
• “An objection based on one ground at trial is insufficient to preserve an appellate attack based on a different ground.”
• “An objection based on one ground at trial is insufficient to preserve an appellate attack based on a different ground.”
• “An objection based on one ground at trial is insufficient to preserve an appellate attack based on a different ground.”
• “An objection based on one ground at trial is insufficient to preserve an appellate attack based on a different ground.”
• objection to evidence on one ground is insufficient to preserve appellate attack on another ground

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).