People v. Armand

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that even if a statement by the government could be read as a stipulation to standing, “[w]e are not bound to accept, as controlling, stipulations as to questions of law” (quotation marks omitted)
• “There is a difference between a search and a seizure. A search involves an invasion of privacy; a seizure is a taking of property. The owner of a chattel which has been seized certainly has standing to seek its return.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).