People v. Arcos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the theory that “a [section] 115-10.1 statement standing alone is insufficient to convict when later disavowed at trial” because “it is for the trier of fact to weigh the statement, weigh the disavowal, and determine which is to be believed”
• the court reversed defendant’s conviction since the witness disavowed earlier statement implicating defendant in the murder and there was no corroboration for the earlier statement
• the court reversed defendant's conviction since the witness disavowed earlier statement implicating defendant in the murder and there was no corroboration for the earlier statement
• evi­dence insufficient to sustain conviction where alleged eyewitness disavowed his previous out-of-court state­ments at trial
• the court reversed 1-02-0966 defendant's conviction since the witness disavowed earlier statement implicating defendant in the murder and there was no corroboration for the earlier statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).