Skip to main content

Citations

  • 1 A.D.3d 244
  • 767 N.Y.S.2d 765
  • 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12186

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing “‘functional equivalent of contractual privity’ under the three prong test in Ossining” in the context of a breach of contract claim
  • no intimate nexus because bidders unknown to defendants at time of alleged negligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.