People v. Anthony V.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Undisputed facts in a motion to suppress are reviewed de novo, but the trial court’s findings of fact and credibility determinations, and inferences drawn therefrom by the trial court and arresting officers, will be given due deference.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Thornton
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2020-03-31· cited 44×
• People v. Rhinehart
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-11-30· cited 21×
• People v. Miller
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2005-02-07· cited 15×
• People v. Holmes
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2019-06-28· cited 5×
• People v. Tennort
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2023-06-27· cited 5×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Florida v. J. L.
  Supreme Court· 2000-03-28· cited 1,787×
• Florida v. JL
  Supreme Court· 2000-03-28· cited 1,350×
• People v. Ross
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-10-17· cited 36×
• People v. Rivera
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-05-01· cited 33×
• People v. Young
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-06-30· cited 31×
• People v. Carlson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-05-09· cited 7×
• People v. Freeman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-09-30· cited 4×