Illinois Supreme Court· 12/6/2001

People v. Anthony

Citations

761 N.E.2d 1188
198 Ill. 2d 194
260 Ill. Dec. 632
2001 Ill. LEXIS 1446

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“ ‘This court has construed the search and seizure language found in section 6 in a manner that is consistent with the Supreme Court’s fourth amendment jurisprudence’ ”
“[A] search conducted with a defendant’s voluntary consent but without a warrant does not violate the fourth amendment.”
“a search conducted with a defendant’s voluntary consent but without a warrant does not violate the fourth amendment”
“a search conducted with a defendant’s voluntary consent but without a warrant does not violate the fourth amendment”
“[A] search conducted with a defendant’s voluntary consent but without a warrant does not violate the fourth amendment.”
“Consent must be received, not extracted ‘by explicit or implicit means, by implied threat or covert force.’” (quoting Schneckloth, 412 U.S. at 229

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fitzgerald, Garman, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.