People v. A.N.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although denial of motion for substitution of judge was not a final, appealable order in its own right, jurisdiction existed to consider the issue because interlocutory appeal from denial of injunctive relief was immediately appealable pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 307(a)(1
• holding that although denial of motion for substitution of judge was not a final, appealable order in its own right, jurisdiction existed to consider the issue because interlocutory appeal from denial of injunctive relief was immediately appealable pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 307(a)(1
• applying Berlin’s rationale to the State’s appeal under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 604(a)(1) (eff. Nov. 1, 2000)
• reviewing court had jurisdiction to review motion to substitute judge where, had the motion to substitute judge been granted, judge would not have retained position to rule on the motion specified in the notice of appeal
• wherein the State presented testimony of the investigator about his investigation and the minor's confession
• wherein the State presented testimony of the investigator about his investigation and the minor’s confession

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).