People v. Alvardo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Most courts agree that under the full faith and credit statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1738 (1994
• “[P]reclusive effect should not be given to issues . . . that were not actually litigated in a prior action.” (citation omitted)
• preclusive effect should not be given to issues or claims that were not actually litigated in a prior action
• preclusive effect generally not given to judgments entered by default
• certified question accepted from bankruptcy appellate panel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).