People v. Allen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming denial of § □□□□□□ motion for DNA testing, before the statute was amended in 2012, because Mr. Allen had pled guilty
• court \should have held a hearing to ascertain ‘whether the DNA evidence in question exists.\”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Byrdsong
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-08-01· cited 5×
• People v. Allen
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1988-05-19· cited 4×
• People v. Lebron
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-10-02· cited 3×