People v. Alderman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Rehabilitation, one of the purposes of sentencing, constitutes a legitimate state interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Frank
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2000-08-03· cited 75×
• People v. Maestas
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1996-01-25· cited 68×
• Verrier v. Colorado Department of Corrections
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2003-07-31· cited 38×
• People v. Silva
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2006-04-17· cited 4×
• Dennis Reed Grenemyer v. Frank Gunter Gale A. Norton, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
  Tenth Circuit· 1992-05-28· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bellendir v. Kezer
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1982-07-19· cited 58×
• People v. Turman
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1983-02-22· cited 51×
• Kallenberger v. Buchanan
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1982-07-29· cited 20×
• Castro v. DIST. COURT OF TENTH JUDICIAL DIST.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1982-12-20· cited 16×
• Alexander v. Wilson
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1975-09-15· cited 15×

Other cases named People v. Alderman

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• People v. Alderman
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1979-10-22
• People v. Alderman
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2019-07-17