People v. Alas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense 5 barred, the District Court did not err in dismissing them with prejudice. See LaSpina v. SEIU Pa. State Council, 985 F.3d 278, 291 (3d Cir. 2021
• “The diversion agreements resulted in deferral of prosecution of the offenses at issue. As a consequence . . . there are no ‘outstanding judgments’ or ‘convictions or sentences’ against [the plaintiff].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).