People v. Al-Ladkani

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court’s misapplication of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act did not contribute to the court’s decision, and because the moving party was not prejudiced
• explaining that, in a custody case, relief is not warranted unless the party claiming error suffered prejudice from the mistake
• determining trial court must perform its mandated responsibilities under the UCCJEA, including the requirement that it shall allow the parties to submit information relevant to the enumerated factors to determine an inconvenient forum
• “[Relief] is not warranted merely because some irregularity occurred during the trial . . . ; the moving party must demonstrate . . . . that he or she has suffered prejudice from the mistake[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).