People v. Ack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the exclusion for professional services rendered applied, as there was no explicit privity requirement, when attorney was being sued for malicious prosecution by the defendant in that case, but attorney only had privity with his client
• the Third Circuit “has adopted a policy disfavoring default judgments.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).